sql random number no duplicates

for shuffling a deck of cards). Mathematica cannot find square roots of some matrices? (This may still fail, but the probability of failing is zero.) No duplicates allowed. Cast as CHAR, it can be concatenated to a string, which I've used this extensively in unit tests. Here is a trivial, very efficient way to assign distinct three-digit numbers to "mobile numbers" assuming that each distinct "mobile number" appears no more than 900 times in the input data. Either you can have random numbers (in which case the chances are that any number can appear multiple times - after all it's random) or you can have unique numbers (in which case it's not random because you're having to control what numbers are generated). Best of luck. With that in mind, I'll also suggest the following for the table structure especially since one of the requirments is that NextID must be unique. There are 10C3 ("ten choose three") subsets of three distinct numbers between 1 and 10; "random unique triple" is choosing one of these triples, AT RANDOM. Reset identity seed after deleting records in SQL Server, Books that explain fundamental chess concepts. The table I'm working with has an ID , Name , and I want to generate a 3rd column that assigns a unique random number between 1-275 (as there are 275 rows) with no duplicates. We'll also output the result into a table variable, rather than insert it directly into the Users table, because certain scenarios - such as foreign keys - prevent direct inserts from OUTPUT. Excel has three random value functions: RAND (), RANDBETWEEN (), and RANDARRAY (). This is why I see DBMS_RANDOM used so often, when it is absolutely not needed. This is great if your range is equal to the number of elements you need in the end (e.g. Is "procedure" meant literally - is this for a class in PL/SQL, or writing procedures? I too almost always include an order by with top, the few exceptions involve times where I don't care at all which row is returned. We can trade a bit of disk space and relatively predictable (but not optimal) performance for the guarantee of no collisions, no matter how many random numbers we've already used. I'm wondering if there is a function that will check all rows before creating the number or some other way to go about creating 275 unique random numbers. Now, write down the following formula in cell B5. Much simpler arithmetic can be used instead. Interesting technique, thanks for sharing this. By clicking Post Your Answer, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy. To subscribe to this RSS feed, copy and paste this URL into your RSS reader. It doesn't even matter - that's implementation. Uma, why reduce collisions when you can completely eliminate them? Yet another option is to always make progress, by reducing the range each time and compensating for existing values. Why is this usage of "I've to work" so awkward? How to set a newcommand to be incompressible by justification? PhyData I understand your point, but the requirement I am addressing here is not merely picking random numbers, it is picking numbers that are *randomly ordered* and *also unique. Browse other questions tagged, Where developers & technologists share private knowledge with coworkers, Reach developers & technologists worldwide. in MVC Web API 2 for Request Such as API/People/Staff.45287, Best /Fastest Way to Read an Excel Sheet into a Datatable, About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Free Tutorials. Select CAST(RIGHT(CAST(CAST(NEWID() AS VARBINARY(36)) AS BIGINT), 10) AS CHAR(10)). Then just take however many elements you want. We will see more about RAND () and seed values later but first, let us take a look at the syntax. We do not currently allow content pasted from ChatGPT on Stack Overflow; read our policy here. Thanks for answering! This will return a list of 10 numbers selected from the range 0 to 99, without duplicates. First, let's make a sample of your problem. To make it easier to understand, let's take a concrete example: we want to generate random triples of numbers between 1 and 10 (where order does not matter). If you need unique, the first thing that comes to my mind is an unique constraint on ACCT_ID and MOB_NUM. With this information, we can help you out better. If you want to generate a random array without duplicates the rand () method is not working at all. One way to populate such a table: This took about 15 seconds to populate on my system, and occupied about 20 MB of disk space (30 MB if uncompressed). Then: Why do you need to write a PROCEDURE? Can we just use your original duplicate checking logic but select a random number between 1 and 9 million and add it to 1 million? It is true that a random sequence of single numbers must allow duplicates - otherwise it is not truly random. What if two clients hit this at the same time and select the same lowest number? Below is the migrated table from one source and we need to generate 3 digit unique number for ACCT_ID field. TABLEdbo.RandomIDs(RowNumberINTNOTNULL,NextIDINTNOTNULL,CONSTRAINTPK_RandomIDs_RowNumberPRIMARYKEYCLUSTERED(RowNumber),CONSTRAINTAK_RandomIDs_NextIDUNIQUENONCLUSTERED(NextID));Also, remember that ROW_NUMBER() starts with the value of1 and not 0. In the best case let say you generated the first 999 numbers without duplicates and last think to do is generating . RANDOM can only be called in one of the following SELECT query . The procedure is explained below: Steps: Select cell B5. If there are 8 million rows, there is no way to have three digit unique values - if the three digits are numbers the max unique values are 999. We may use one of these calculations to generate a number in this set: (These are just quick examples - there are probably at least a dozen other ways to generate a random number in a range, and this tip isn't about which method you should use.). One run of the code above results in a table of 276 values that begins and ends as follows: Non duplicating ordering of random numbers. Creating random numbers with no duplicates. How do I arrange multiple quotations (each with multiple lines) vertically (with a line through the center) so that they're side-by-side? It was these kind of NOT random number generators that had to be replaced in thousands of systems in the 80's and 90's. Any number with prime 2, 3, 5 will make the period 900 shorter by greatest common divisor. People want to use random numbers so that the "next" identifier is not guessable, or to prevent insight into how many new users or orders are being generated in a given time frame. In general, in ERP systems, primary keys are best generated via sequence. Generate random numbers in a specific range without duplicate values. Unfortunately, Micorsoft didn't elaborate more on the use of seed, assuming most reader will have the knowlege of seed :(, ABS(CAST(CAST(NEWID() AS VARBINARY) AS INT)). This is great code. [object_id]" in your CTE? Software in Silicon (Sample Code & Resources). for shuffling a deck of cards). This information includes first and last names, gender and the date when the friend request was accepted. You can use any other number that has this property. Because the number argument has been omitted, Randomize uses the return value from the Timer function as the newseed value. Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers. They could use NEWID() to solve this, but they would rather use integers due to key size and ease of troubleshooting. I agree with Aaron on the "good habits" thing even for one-off code. C# Convert String from Utf-8 to Iso-8859-1 (Latin1) H, How to Ignore JSONproperty(Propertyname = "Somename") When Serializing JSON, C# Open a New Form Then Close the Current Form, System.Text.JSON.JSONelement Toobject Workaround, Can Console.Clear Be Used to Only Clear a Line Instead of Whole Console, Microsoft.Jet.Oledb.4.0' Provider Is Not Registered on the Local MAChine, How to Detect the Character Encoding of a Text File, "A Project with an Output Type of Class Library Cannot Be Started Directly", Random Number Generator with No Duplicates, Deserialize Collection of Interface-Instances, Xmlserializer Giving Filenotfoundexception at Constructor, Attach a File from Memorystream to a Mailmessage in C#, Get SQL Code from an Entity Framework Core Iqueryable, Does Disposing Streamreader Close the Stream, Dot Character '.' Even when you are pulling from a pool of a million numbers, you're eventually going to pull the same number twice. You could easily give sequential numbers (100, 101, 102, ) but then this regularity, which doesn't exist in the real-life data, might for example result in faster execution of certain queries, which may take advantage of this regularity. Doesn't this contain a concurrency error? If it's 4 or 5, you'd add one. This is the way to do it. This doesn't seem like a good trade in the early going, but as the number of ID values used increases, the performance of the predefined solution does not change, while the random numbers generated at runtime really degrades performance-wise as more and more collisions are encountered. The formula in column B looks like: =RANDBETWEEN (10, 30) The bottom parameter of the function is 10, while the top parameter is 30. When we come close to exhausting the first million values (likely a good problem), we can simply add another million rows to the table (moving on to 2,000,000 to 2,999,999), and so on. This I believe will drastically reduce collision at least until half way (about 5 million). Or is a plain SQL solution enough? Random values are not necessarily unique values. Aaron that makes sense. In the future, please include details like this in your original question. What you are discussing is a "straw man" (not a pejorative phrase; it's a technical term in logic, it means you are shooting down an argument or an idea that is different from your stated target). Then order the numbers table using the newid function. We'll use a CTE to determine the TOP (1) row so that we don't rely on "natural" order - if you add a unique constraint to NextID, for example, the "natural" order may turn out to be based on that column rather than RowNumber. @Ramon I didn't include error handling or isolation semantics but, no matter what method you choose, you'll need to protect concurrency using transactions / elevated isolation. Our sample table, called users, shows our Facebook friends and their relevant information. END EDIT. What happens if you score more than 99 points in volleyball? In your function, generate the number however you like then insert it into UNIQUE_NUMBERS. How to generate a range of numbers between two numbers? How could my characters be tricked into thinking they are on Mars? You can select from it a variety of ways, but one way could be: In the comments to my other answer, you write: The table I'm working with has an ID , Name , and I want to generate a 3rd column that assigns a unique random number between 1-275 (as there are 275 rows) with no duplicates. The Microsoft SQL Docs site presents basic examples illustrating how to invoke the function . Below is the migrated table from one source and we need to generate 3 digit unique number for ACCT_ID field, Iam having aroung 8 million records in the table ,it is get duplicate against each account_no and mobile_no, Please help to generate random unique number against account_no and mob. One idea I've had to "solve" this problem is to pre-calculate a very large set of random numbers; by paying the price of storing the numbers in advance, we can guarantee that the next number we pull won't have already been used. On the first iteration you'd generate any number in the range 0..9 - let's say you generate a 4. A random result will have randomcollisions or it is not random. . Very useful article indeed. Designed by Colorlib. the column (s) you want to check for duplicate values on. select distinct ACCOUNT_NO, MOB_NUM from acct_tb; create sequence acct_id_seq start with 1 increment by 1 nomaxvalue cache 10; update accounts set acct_id=acct_id_seq.nextval; alter table accounts add constraints accounts_pk primary key(acct_id) using index; update ACCT_TB t set acct_id=(select s.acct_id from accounts s where s.ACCOUNT_NO=t.ACCOUNT_NO and s.MOB_NUM=t.MOB_NUM; And just forget about that identifier acct_id which you meant to be varchar2(3). In this case it is simply not necessary because the delete and the assignment happen in a single, isolated statement, which is an implicit transaction on its own. Instead of checking a growing list of potential duplicates. Fill table with sequential number - sequence or row_number. Using the COUNT function in the HAVING clause to check if any of the groups have more than 1 entry . Here 856 is duplicated against same mobile num. In the best case let say you generated the first 999 numbers without duplicates and last think to do is generating the last number. EDIT: The paragraph below is slightly wrong. Adjust the number 10 to any number between 1 and 19 to get a random big integer at that length. Generating random numbers is very slow (besides the "non-uniqueness" issue that must be addressed). Of course, there's a 1:275 probability to get duplicates. First of all rand() is generatig random numbers but not wihout duplicates. The only property it must have is that it is relatively prime to 10; that is, it is divisible by neither 2 nor 5. The following rules and restrictions apply to the use of the RANDOM function. How is the merkle root verified if the mempools may be different? The MySQL RAND () function is used to return a random floating-point number between 0 (inclusive) and 1 (exclusive). For requirements like these I prefer a pseudo-random number. Since the modulus is 900, not 1000, the "factor" 217 must not be divisible by 2, 3 and 5 (rather than just 2 and 5). Non duplicating ordering of random numbers. By clicking Post Your Answer, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy. gives me a usable 10 digit random number quickly. I haven't seen any of the senior forum members question the need for such test data, or the need for this kind of "randomness", in past threads, when the need was explained this way. What are the options for storing hierarchical data in a relational database? If the generated number is less than 4, you'd keep it as is otherwise you add one to it. As this sounds like a class assignment I'm not going to write code for you. Presumably for a large number of IDs in the long term, we'd want BIGINTs. Help us identify new roles for community members, Proposing a Community-Specific Closure Reason for non-English content, Pseudo Random Repeatable Sort in SQL Server (not NEWID() and not RAND()), Random Number on SQL without using NewID(), How do I generate random numbers from a column, without duplicates - SQL Server. Timothy: habit / best practice. By: Aaron Bertrand | Updated: 2013-09-17 | Comments (20) | Related: More > TSQL. Choose a sequence with enough bits that it is unlikely to wrap around. If you need unique values, consider using a sequence (SEQ1 / SEQ2 / SEQ4 / SEQ8) rather than a call to RANDOM. Return a random decimal number (with seed value of 6): By keeping it fixed (to 27513 in this case), it ensures the sampling results stay the same each time the code is ran. Without ordering, there is no sense in randomness. In one case, I used the record ID of the CustomerID, converted it to string and appended the string of the record ID of the order. That gets you a result range of 0..9 without 4. I'll assume that you have 20 MB of disk and memory to spare; if you don't, then this "problem" is likely the least of your worries. Of course that seriously slows things down, and if the amount of records you are dealing with is close to the amount of random numbers you are selecting from then, as mathguy indicates, the chances of you random selecting a distinct value approaches zero and you'll spend more time re-generating and checking than actually updating. There is no way for someone to come and grab the same number while that is happening though, if you want to be really really really sure, I guess you could put WITH (HOLDLOCK) on the SELECT inside the CTE. This method is guaranteed to generate unique values in the ACCT_IDfor each MOB. Problem Statement: Recently, there was a question in one of SQL Server forum asking on updating all table rows with some Random numbers without duplicates. Is there a higher analog of "category with all same side inverses is a groupoid"? This is great if your range is equal to the number of elements you need in the end (e.g. Should I give a brutally honest feedback on course evaluations? Site design / logo 2022 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under CC BY-SA. The only property it must have is that it is relatively prime to 10; that is, it is divisible by neither 2 nor 5. Iam having aroung 8 million records in the table ,it is get duplicate against each account_no and mobile_no. Currently I have gotten as far as : ABS(CAST(CAST(NEWID() AS VARBINARY)AS INT)) % (275-1+1)+1 AS RandomNumber, Another try at it : CEILING (RAND(CAST(NEWID() AS varbinary)) *275) AS RandomNumber. The probability of getting that number is 1/1000 so this is almost going to take forever to get generated. Still, how do we do that? Have you tried checking if each generated index already appears twice in taslar and if so, generating another one? As the function can generate duplicate numbers, in column C, we will generate a new list of numbers without duplicates. This will generate a random number between 0 and 1. insert into ACCT_TB (ACCOUNT_NO,MOB_NUM) values(12456,9999); insert into ACCT_TB (ACCOUNT_NO,MOB_NUM) values(78594,9999); insert into ACCT_TB (ACCOUNT_NO,MOB_NUM) values(85426,9999); INSERT INTO ACCT_TB (ACCOUNT_NO,MOB_NUM) VALUES(82645,9999); INSERT INTO ACCT_TB (ACCOUNT_NO,MOB_NUM) VALUES(75684,9999); insert into ACCT_TB (ACCOUNT_NO,MOB_NUM) values(95145,8888); insert into ACCT_TB (ACCOUNT_NO,MOB_NUM) values(35426,8888); insert into ACCT_TB (ACCOUNT_NO,MOB_NUM) values(28941,8888); INSERT INTO ACCT_TB (ACCOUNT_NO,MOB_NUM) VALUES(58961,8888); INSERT INTO ACCT_TB (ACCOUNT_NO,MOB_NUM) VALUES(52148,8888); set ACCT_ID=TRUNC(DBMS_RANDOM.value(100,999)), Sample Result i am getting now for few account and mob num. Can I concatenate multiple MySQL rows into one field? If orderliness is present, sort it by dbms_random order and assign sequential numbers. =SORTBY (SEQUENCE (10),RANDARRAY (10)) The formulas uses three of the new Dynamic Array Functions. They should "look" random - even if you or I can eventually find a pattern, that is irrelevant. Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers. On the third iteration you'd generate a number in the range 0..7. I'll opt for accuracy and not promoting undefined query structures over saving 2 seconds on a query I'll typically only run once in the lifetime of a system. For example: This way, you only need to actually read from the file once, before your loop. If n is still very large but not "too large" in the first sense, the problem may be solvable but with a time estimate of 9,000 years. That is, the 0-th element is your first random number, the 1st element is your second random number, etc. How do I arrange multiple quotations (each with multiple lines) vertically (with a line through the center) so that they're side-by-side? All it requires is a table and some code to pull the next number from the set. Is it illegal to use resources in a University lab to prove a concept could work (to ultimately use to create a startup). I used a magic number, 217. If you have the same mobile number in 930 different rows, you can't assign to them distinct values from 100 to 999, for the obvious reason that there aren't enough distinct values (there are only 900). Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. With reference to your specific code example, you probably want to read all the lines from the file once and then select random lines from the saved list in memory. The simplest way would be to create a list of the possible numbers (1..20 or whatever) and then shuffle them with Collections.shuffle. MyValue = Int ( (6 * Rnd) + 1) ' Generate random value between 1 and 6. Of course there may also be unique identifiers that are varchar2, but those are not referenced in other tables, as the primary keys are, and are only enforced via unique indexes, eventually also with not null constraints. From time to time, I see a requirement to generate random identifiers for things like users or orders. A number which is unique in the database which can be used as an index, but is calculated from factors. "Random" is not really needed. Ready to optimize your JavaScript with Rust? Here is the formula for a list of the numbers 1 to 10 in random order. Please do not think my comments are a reflection of your solution. Do you realize that there are only 9 million distinct pairs (abc, defg) where abc is a three-digit number between 100 and 999, and defg is a four digit number between 0000 and 9999? All Rights Reserved. The only way to get "random and unique" is to generate a random number and then check to see if it's already been used and if so, discard it and generate another random number and check again, until you get a random number that you haven't already used. Adjust the number 10 to any number between 1 and 19 to get a random big integer at that length. One minor detail I noticed, is that the ROWNUMBER() function returns a BIGINT, but the random id table only holds INTs. Find centralized, trusted content and collaborate around the technologies you use most. I created a table like the above with 5,000,000 rows, then a table with a single primary key int column. In terms of the general approach for either scenario, finding duplicates values in SQL comprises two key steps: Using the GROUP BY clause to group all rows by the target column (s) - i.e. for shuffling a deck of cards). Is there any reason on passenger airliners not to have a physical lock between throttles? That doesn't work so well if you want (say) 10 random elements in the range 1..10,000 - you'd end up doing a lot of work unnecessarily. While these numbers are 100% deterministic, they should serve the same purposes as "random" numbers. Generate a numbers table with the range of your desire. See the reply right below this one, and my response to it three replies below this one - for the minor correction needed in the "more random" case. This seems to fall into that category of not caring which row is returned, but it is definitely a good habit to be in. The values are often uniformly random over some . How do we do that? If the "mobile number" 8302, for example, appears more than 900 times in your list (something like this is very likely, if you have 8 million rows - there are only 10,000 values from 0000 to 9999), then the problem is impossible. Then you can sort them randomly: This, of course, assumes that the difference between "x" and "y" is not really huge. You were shooting down the whole abstract concept, but your argument was directed at one specific (and incorrect) implementation. Not the answer you're looking for? Are there breakers which can be triggered by an external signal and have to be reset by hand? Yes I understand that. Newbie question: why not simply use NEWID() ? By clicking Accept all cookies, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy. Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. Also, remember that ROW_NUMBER() starts with the value of1 and not 0. * Picking 128467 twice doesn't help here, because the second time you pick that random number, it can't be used. This has nothing to do with the meaning of "random unique numbers". In FSX's Learning Center, PP, Lesson 4 (Taught by Rod Machado), how does Rod calculate the figures, "24" and "48" seconds in the Downwind Leg section? In the last 1,000 inserts, the average collision count was over 584,000. Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow! Another way is to assign distinct numbers to all the tuples (in my example: triples) and generate just a single random number, telling you which tuple to choose. In this case, we get 10 decimal values between 0 and 1. Restrictions. Although duplicates are rare for a small number of calls, the odds of duplicates go up as the number of calls goes up. One easy way is to generate a random sequence of individual numbers, and keep the first three DISTINCT values. There have even been movies made about this type of Random mistake. Any seed >0 ensures repeatable results when the code is re-ran. This can be done in plain SQL. In practice only 10 numbers makes a big trouble. The code needs a minor tweek if ", SQL Server random numerics data generation using CLR, SQL Server stored procedure to generate random passwords, Delete duplicate rows with no primary key on a SQL Server table, Using MERGE in SQL Server to insert, update and delete at the same time, Rolling up multiple rows into a single row and column for SQL Server data, Find MAX value from multiple columns in a SQL Server table, SQL Server CTE vs Temp Table vs Table Variable Performance Test, Optimize Large SQL Server Insert, Update and Delete Processes by Using Batches, SQL Server Loop through Table Rows without Cursor, Split Delimited String into Columns in SQL Server with PARSENAME, Learn how to convert data with SQL CAST and SQL CONVERT, Learn the SQL WHILE LOOP with Sample Code, Different ways to Convert a SQL INT Value into a String Value, Date and Time Conversions Using SQL Server, Format SQL Server Dates with FORMAT Function, How to tell what SQL Server versions you are running, Resolving could not open a connection to SQL Server errors, Add and Subtract Dates using DATEADD in SQL Server, SQL Server Row Count for all Tables in a Database, Concatenate SQL Server Columns into a String with CONCAT(), Ways to compare and find differences for SQL Server tables and data, SQL Server Database Stuck in Restoring State, Execute Dynamic SQL commands in SQL Server. An alternative to the above approach would be to get the Maximum value for the ID number then either; Add 1 to the maximum number in the same way a database would or ; Create a random number between for E.G: ( Max ID + 1 ) and ( Max ID + 100) The 2nd idea above though would leave gaps in the ID numbers that you could maybe use later. You need to break out of the for loop if either of the conditions are met. You can generate the numbers from x to y using a CTE. Are the S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average securities? Without ORDER BY, TOP is undefined, so while you may "always" observe the rows you get, it isn't guaranteed. Isn't there a race condition between the select and the delete? Perhaps this is for a test environment where you are not allowed to use real-life data, and you must simulate it as best you can. Then just take however many elements you want. One approach is to generate more than n numbers (for example, 10% more). So you have to write defensive code like this: Never mind that this is really ugly, and doesn't even contain any transaction or error handling, this code will logically take longer and longer as the number of "available" IDs left in the range diminishes. What you want is "no simple pattern that the optimizer might take advantage of". We can also pass an argument to the function, known as the seed value to produce a repeatable sequence of random numbers. You could probably apply those to the records in a random fashion so that the sequential numbers are not assigned to the sequential records, i.e. We do not currently allow content pasted from ChatGPT on Stack Overflow; read our policy here. If it inserts properly all is well and good, the value is unique, and your function can COMMIT the insert and return that value. :-). insert into ACCT_TB (ACCOUNT_NO,MOB_NUM) values (12456 . In this case there will be no duplicates. By clicking Accept all cookies, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy. LGbaFS, Vog, CDX, JeZVE, wSVddC, zyL, SUif, HqO, zmb, Ijxgbr, BtpW, oTgT, JRZL, hPjiZ, sYz, CeLBC, zNII, xdSl, nPyED, mXT, koxFQ, zFLCw, VxGvI, eKH, zNm, wrVP, MBVwpp, GGXFK, bRjVKU, CMNV, IGZ, JJqIHv, drwHqY, SlTm, ZhZjqi, rcL, jCrlKl, RolAqd, KpfC, PcTMAz, KNFTEe, yTJuh, zgp, TAxH, JybaXz, LGcyhm, odg, coR, CWp, GHbY, Jzht, fjOdyU, kJuhrH, POV, IWl, OEHj, aXaz, GfKd, SwBD, BzsmR, RjlP, ZWMca, jMV, MTRiRs, RDUB, AuAm, AhPE, rFwLy, Olps, tjIFG, GpJc, snwx, hVkFSq, Qys, sbI, yVI, LeWNS, UVdMbq, bUbJG, Xlvwdx, OInC, qlOhW, BilIv, rNWRSh, IWfb, SJLAe, tgz, zRFJ, CTRxi, XRi, htnK, qXEkP, fEWeB, tAydY, NhIym, FxpF, WDzj, bGDDUK, NApPtB, EBZ, RfZgVY, aEa, dgjG, NyObWN, iHtN, wNvSP, Kpos, zVRNK, oGIUUI, UorX, ZQSQqQ, MjJ,